<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Industry Scoop: Warrior vs. Maverik Lacrosse Lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laxallstars.com/industry-scoop-warrior-vs-maverik-lacrosse-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laxallstars.com/industry-scoop-warrior-vs-maverik-lacrosse-lawsuit/</link>
	<description>Lacrosse Media Outlet / By Players, For Players / Grow The Game</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:37:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Industry Scoop: Warrior Vs. Under Armour Lawsuit &#124; Lacrosse All Stars</title>
		<link>http://laxallstars.com/industry-scoop-warrior-vs-maverik-lacrosse-lawsuit/#comment-20480</link>
		<dc:creator>Industry Scoop: Warrior Vs. Under Armour Lawsuit &#124; Lacrosse All Stars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laxallstars.com/?p=30452#comment-20480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Warrior’s lacrosse/hockey gloves having floating cuff portions. Warrior has previously sued Maverik, Reebok and Tribe 7 as having infringed these (and additional) patents covering their floating [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Warrior’s lacrosse/hockey gloves having floating cuff portions. Warrior has previously sued Maverik, Reebok and Tribe 7 as having infringed these (and additional) patents covering their floating [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Industry Scoop: Lacrosse Lawsuits Keep On Coming &#124; Lacrosse All Stars</title>
		<link>http://laxallstars.com/industry-scoop-warrior-vs-maverik-lacrosse-lawsuit/#comment-16373</link>
		<dc:creator>Industry Scoop: Lacrosse Lawsuits Keep On Coming &#124; Lacrosse All Stars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laxallstars.com/?p=30452#comment-16373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] gloves, lacrosse heads and shoulder pads. Warrior remains involved in another lawsuit against Maverik for infringement of patents pertaining to gloves and other protective equipment. We will keep you [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gloves, lacrosse heads and shoulder pads. Warrior remains involved in another lawsuit against Maverik for infringement of patents pertaining to gloves and other protective equipment. We will keep you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warrior Lacrosse Drops Dispute Against Reebok &#124; Sweet Sweet Lax</title>
		<link>http://laxallstars.com/industry-scoop-warrior-vs-maverik-lacrosse-lawsuit/#comment-15423</link>
		<dc:creator>Warrior Lacrosse Drops Dispute Against Reebok &#124; Sweet Sweet Lax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laxallstars.com/?p=30452#comment-15423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] competitive.  You might recall mention from a post I commented on back in September 2011 that Warrior Sports had sued Reebok in January 2011 in the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Michigan (case no. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] competitive.  You might recall mention from a post I commented on back in September 2011 that Warrior Sports had sued Reebok in January 2011 in the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Michigan (case no. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P Jones</title>
		<link>http://laxallstars.com/industry-scoop-warrior-vs-maverik-lacrosse-lawsuit/#comment-12782</link>
		<dc:creator>P Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laxallstars.com/?p=30452#comment-12782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was not aware that Warrior had sued Reebok for the same reason...but this may answer Sweet, Sweet Lax&#039;s question as to where Reebok went, and why they have been so quiet.  I&#039;m guessing Reebok has gone back to the drawing board to figure out how to move forward]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was not aware that Warrior had sued Reebok for the same reason&#8230;but this may answer Sweet, Sweet Lax&#8217;s question as to where Reebok went, and why they have been so quiet.  I&#8217;m guessing Reebok has gone back to the drawing board to figure out how to move forward</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coach B comments on Warrior vs. Maverik lawsuit in LAS &#171; Coach B&#039;s Lax Blog</title>
		<link>http://laxallstars.com/industry-scoop-warrior-vs-maverik-lacrosse-lawsuit/#comment-5989</link>
		<dc:creator>Coach B comments on Warrior vs. Maverik lawsuit in LAS &#171; Coach B&#039;s Lax Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laxallstars.com/?p=30452#comment-5989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Click the following link to read my legal perspective on the lawsuit.  Warrior vs. Maverik lawsuit [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click the following link to read my legal perspective on the lawsuit.  Warrior vs. Maverik lawsuit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Band</title>
		<link>http://laxallstars.com/industry-scoop-warrior-vs-maverik-lacrosse-lawsuit/#comment-12779</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Band</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laxallstars.com/?p=30452#comment-12779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is going to get interesting.  Two things make me think that Warrior and its lawyers must think that they have a valid claim: (1) Warrior hasn&#039;t apparently sued Nike/STX, Harrow, or any number of others that also manufacture gloves; (2) Maverik (and Reebok) is not some mom n&#039; pop operation that can be bullied off the playground just by the mere threat of litigation -- if Warrior filed this complaint that probably means they&#039;re prepared to see it to the end and expect to win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to get interesting.  Two things make me think that Warrior and its lawyers must think that they have a valid claim: (1) Warrior hasn&#8217;t apparently sued Nike/STX, Harrow, or any number of others that also manufacture gloves; (2) Maverik (and Reebok) is not some mom n&#8217; pop operation that can be bullied off the playground just by the mere threat of litigation &#8212; if Warrior filed this complaint that probably means they&#8217;re prepared to see it to the end and expect to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
